Euphorbia esula Scorecard

Species:  Euphorbia esula

Common Name:  leafy spurge

Scorecard created on
Last Updated on

Results

Impact Total:17 / 35Impact = ( Spread + Damage - Benefit )

Ability to Respond Total:15 / 25Ability to Respond = ( Ease of Response + Tools in Place )

Confidence:High

Confidence Notes:

Impact

SpreadNotesScore
Spread RateHas spread rapidly in other northern states, but not as fast in California. This may, in part, be due to the active CDFA control program.3
Spread AmountLeafy spurge is especially problematic in the north-central states and adjacent region of Canada. In all, nearly 3 million acres of rangeland in 29 states are infested, with about 1.1 million acres infested in North Dakota alone.4
DamageNotesScore
EcologicalIn the Dakotas and other highly infested states, lands invaded by leafy spurge renders the land completely unusable from a soil and water profile standpoint. Causes lower water tables and erosion.5
AgriculturalMinor problem of alfalfa, but significant potential to damage livestock production systems.4
Infrastructure0
Cultural0
HealthMildly toxic to animals.1
BenefitNotesScore
Ecological0
Agricultural0
Infrastructure0
Cultural0
Health0
Total17

Ability to Respond

Ease of ResponseNotesScore
DetectionMilky latex and large size makes it fairly easy to detect.4
ControlVery difficult to control in California as the primary herbicide (picloram) is not registered here. Biological control insects available, but their success is variable.1
Tools in PlaceNotesScore
EntryAs an A listed plant by CDFA, some oversight can prevent its introduction. There are general quarantine restrictions on feed, etc and high priority at border stations.4
ControlCDFA mandates control as the plant is A rated.4
OutreachA great deal of educational material is available, although populations are so small in California that it is not widely distributed. On both Cal-IPC and CDFA lists.2
Total15

References

No references yet.